<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consummate Communicator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shorespeak.com/blog/2008/07/consummate-communicator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shorespeak.com/blog/2008/07/consummate-communicator/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Your MQ?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 05:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Consummate Communicator - the sequel &#124; rob shore &#124; 960 blog &#124; what's your MQ?</title>
		<link>http://shorespeak.com/blog/2008/07/consummate-communicator/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Consummate Communicator - the sequel &#124; rob shore &#124; 960 blog &#124; what's your MQ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shorespeak.com/blog/?p=16#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] his post, Consummate Communicator, Rob spoke about various prospect/client communication channels such as Skype, Twitter, or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his post, Consummate Communicator, Rob spoke about various prospect/client communication channels such as Skype, Twitter, or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://shorespeak.com/blog/2008/07/consummate-communicator/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shorespeak.com/blog/?p=16#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Brian,

You raise an excellent and important point re compliance as it relates to new media and retail securities reps.  Your point about the early stage of business acceptance re social media is spot on. 

It does seem to be just a matter of time (years) before the regulators address this issue. In the meantime the fact that your conversant enough to comment and to use technology such as Skype places you way ahead of the pack. 

If you are interested to know more about social media in a corporate setting visit Ron at http://www.ronamok.com. He is a new media evangelist (really) and an original podcaster. My comments scratch the surface - his go 6 feet deep.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>You raise an excellent and important point re compliance as it relates to new media and retail securities reps.  Your point about the early stage of business acceptance re social media is spot on. </p>
<p>It does seem to be just a matter of time (years) before the regulators address this issue. In the meantime the fact that your conversant enough to comment and to use technology such as Skype places you way ahead of the pack. </p>
<p>If you are interested to know more about social media in a corporate setting visit Ron at <a href="http://www.ronamok.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ronamok.com</a>. He is a new media evangelist (really) and an original podcaster. My comments scratch the surface &#8211; his go 6 feet deep.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Simmons</title>
		<link>http://shorespeak.com/blog/2008/07/consummate-communicator/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shorespeak.com/blog/?p=16#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I think we are still early in the business cycle of these types of lines of communication.  I&#039;d compare it to e-mail.  When e-mail first came out, it was used primarily for inter-office communication.  Now it is a viable way to communicate to a lot of the world.  

In my opinion, sites like Twitter and Facebook, etc haven&#039;t evolved enough to be considered for professional correspondence.  Perhaps they will become accepted one day, but they are not main stream enough yet.

Now there may be an exception to the rule - the 24 yr old billionaire internet genius, etc.  Using these services with those clients may actually be necessary, but not for the average client.

However, the part that would prevent me from using these services would be compliance.  It is bad enough to have to get e-mail approved and all the record keeping that goes along with written correspondence.  I would hate to have to go through all that with these new services.  That&#039;s why more often than not, I&#039;d rather call the client up on the phone and have a conversation with them than send an e-mail.  So in my practice, I will be using Skype long before I start using Twitter, Facebook, or any of the other social networking websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we are still early in the business cycle of these types of lines of communication.  I&#8217;d compare it to e-mail.  When e-mail first came out, it was used primarily for inter-office communication.  Now it is a viable way to communicate to a lot of the world.  </p>
<p>In my opinion, sites like Twitter and Facebook, etc haven&#8217;t evolved enough to be considered for professional correspondence.  Perhaps they will become accepted one day, but they are not main stream enough yet.</p>
<p>Now there may be an exception to the rule &#8211; the 24 yr old billionaire internet genius, etc.  Using these services with those clients may actually be necessary, but not for the average client.</p>
<p>However, the part that would prevent me from using these services would be compliance.  It is bad enough to have to get e-mail approved and all the record keeping that goes along with written correspondence.  I would hate to have to go through all that with these new services.  That&#8217;s why more often than not, I&#8217;d rather call the client up on the phone and have a conversation with them than send an e-mail.  So in my practice, I will be using Skype long before I start using Twitter, Facebook, or any of the other social networking websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://shorespeak.com/blog/2008/07/consummate-communicator/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shorespeak.com/blog/?p=16#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

This raises some interesting questions.

What is the boundary between business new media and social new media, especially as it relates to our conservative industry - financial services. 

In some instances the lines are blurred. 

LinkedIn and Plaxo seem to be perfectly acceptable. In fact I get requests for connections from folks that are using their business email addresses. 

On the other hand, almost none of my business contacts are live on Twitter - yet.

You&#039;ve given me great food for thought for another post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>This raises some interesting questions.</p>
<p>What is the boundary between business new media and social new media, especially as it relates to our conservative industry &#8211; financial services. </p>
<p>In some instances the lines are blurred. </p>
<p>LinkedIn and Plaxo seem to be perfectly acceptable. In fact I get requests for connections from folks that are using their business email addresses. </p>
<p>On the other hand, almost none of my business contacts are live on Twitter &#8211; yet.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve given me great food for thought for another post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Klein</title>
		<link>http://shorespeak.com/blog/2008/07/consummate-communicator/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shorespeak.com/blog/?p=16#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m loving the fact that you are using these &quot;new&quot; communication vehicles (not that I&#039;m surprised that you are) to help deliver your message and to allow people to have visibility into what is going on in the world of ShoreSpeak.  As a self proclaimed geek, I enjoy seeing colleagues of mine embrace them as well.

I look forward to the day where my main contacts at the accounts that I support start branching out into these new communication vehicles.  

However, I have struggled with the decision as to if I should extend those vehicles to my contacts in cases where I know they are on Facebook (for example) by doing a simple search.  Is that a breach of work versus personal?  
Some of the coaching I have received thus-far is that I &lt;b&gt; should not &lt;/b&gt;  use these vehicles because it will come off as unprofessional.  But, my feeling is that people join networks like this with the expectation that others will find them. 

What&#039;s your take?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m loving the fact that you are using these &#8220;new&#8221; communication vehicles (not that I&#8217;m surprised that you are) to help deliver your message and to allow people to have visibility into what is going on in the world of ShoreSpeak.  As a self proclaimed geek, I enjoy seeing colleagues of mine embrace them as well.</p>
<p>I look forward to the day where my main contacts at the accounts that I support start branching out into these new communication vehicles.  </p>
<p>However, I have struggled with the decision as to if I should extend those vehicles to my contacts in cases where I know they are on Facebook (for example) by doing a simple search.  Is that a breach of work versus personal?<br />
Some of the coaching I have received thus-far is that I <b> should not </b>  use these vehicles because it will come off as unprofessional.  But, my feeling is that people join networks like this with the expectation that others will find them. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s your take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live and Twitting &#124; shorespeak 960 blog - what's your MQ?</title>
		<link>http://shorespeak.com/blog/2008/07/consummate-communicator/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Live and Twitting &#124; shorespeak 960 blog - what's your MQ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shorespeak.com/blog/?p=16#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] a prior post I spoke about the need to meet clients and prospects on the communication turf that they choose to play [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a prior post I spoke about the need to meet clients and prospects on the communication turf that they choose to play [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

